Page 1 of 1
Guide?
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2021 10:51 pm
by Chaython
Any info on this tool?
For example interrupt time percent is 0%
But interrupts/sec is 1000-30000
DPC/sec 7-1471
DPC rate 0-18
DPC time 0%
So what does this all mean, and how can I better it?
The interrupts/second are 1000-1300 on all cores except core 10 which has 30000, so does that mean core 10 has higher utilization or isn't working correctly?
Anyways, in normal usage system works fine, I downloaded this tool, curious if it would help me in determining why my system is very stuttery after running nicehash.
Re: Guide?
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 9:46 am
by Wagnard
Chaython wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 10:51 pm
Any info on this tool?
For example interrupt time percent is 0%
But interrupts/sec is 1000-30000
DPC/sec 7-1471
DPC rate 0-18
DPC time 0%
So what does this all mean, and how can I better it?
The interrupts/second are 1000-1300 on all cores except core 10 which has 30000, so does that mean core 10 has higher utilization or isn't working correctly?
Anyways, in normal usage system works fine, I downloaded this tool, curious if it would help me in determining why my system is very stuttery after running nicehash.
Hi, this tools was just for informations and for my case more specifically the "Threads" section.But to answer some of your question, it is normal that 1 of your core have more interrupt and DPC than the other cores, that is how it is supposed to work. I wont go on technical detail of why (google may help you there). But lets just say, that's how Windows does it's stuff.
Re: Guide?
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 3:53 pm
by Chaython
Thanks for replying.
I always assumed core 1 was most utilized.
But core 20 has 20x the interrupts.
Re: Guide?
Posted: Sun May 02, 2021 3:09 pm
by Wagnard
Just wanted to say that the this tool is quite old and I've look a little in my code and it is possible there is some bugs related to theses high number.
Will try to see and fix this if it's the case.
Re: Guide?
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 11:37 am
by Wagnard
Chaython wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 3:53 pm
Thanks for replying.
I always assumed core 1 was most utilized.
But core 20 has 20x the interrupts.
I have updated the app, it should look more normal now.
There was an issue with the rows.
Anyway this app will need a major redesign one day. Interface and performance need more love.
