Intelligent Standby List Cleaner (ISLC) v1.0.4.6 Released

[MrGlopez]

I have some doubts about a function of this program, specifically the timer resolution, as configured and you can see in the program the maximum timer resolution is set to 0.50 ms and the minimum is set by default to 15,625 ms, I am the one The only one who has noticed that the minimum is much greater than the maximum??? To explain myself better, these values should be reversed, minimum 0.50 ms and maximum 15,625 ms because otherwise it doesn't make sense that the minimum latency in milliseconds is much higher than the maximum..... can someone clarify this?

Since I did performance tests and I saw that, for example, in my case, FortInte makes a request to make it 10,000 ms of timer resolution, Synapse 3 makes another request to make it 20,000 ms and ISLC makes a request to make it 5000 ms, so which one takes for good windows??? because although in ISLC it says that the current one is 0.5 it does not mean that it is really assigned like that in windows I think.....

Warnings
Platform Timer Resolution: Timer Request Pending
A program or service requested a timer resolution that is less than the platform's maximum timer resolution.
Requested Period 10000
Requesting process id 9464
Requesting process path \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Users\Mr.Glopez\Desktop\WinTimerTester.exe
Platform Timer Resolution: Timer Request Pending
A program or service requested a timer resolution that is less than the platform's maximum timer resolution.
Period requested 5000
Requesting process id 9044
Requesting process path \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files\ISLC\Intelligent standby list cleaner ISLC.exe
Platform Timer Resolution: Timer Request Pending
A program or service requested a timer resolution that is less than the platform's maximum timer resolution.
Requested period 20000
Requesting process id 5404
Requesting process path \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files (x86)\Razer\Synapse3\Service\Razer Synapse Service.exe
Power Directive:Long darkening timeout (with AC power)
The screen is set to automatically dim after more than 10 minutes.
Wait time (seconds) 885

[Wagnard]

I have some doubts about a function of this program, specifically the timer resolution, as configured and you can see in the program the maximum timer resolution is set to 0.50 ms and the minimum is set by default to 15,625 ms, I am the one The only one who has noticed that the minimum is much greater than the maximum??? To explain myself better, these values should be reversed, minimum 0.50 ms and maximum 15,625 ms because otherwise it doesn't make sense that the minimum latency in milliseconds is much higher than the maximum..... can someone clarify this?

Since I did performance tests and I saw that, for example, in my case, FortInte makes a request to make it 10,000 ms of timer resolution, Synapse 3 makes another request to make it 20,000 ms and ISLC makes a request to make it 5000 ms, so which one takes for good windows??? because although in ISLC it says that the current one is 0.5 it does not mean that it is really assigned like that in windows I think.....

Warnings
Platform Timer Resolution: Timer Request Pending
A program or service requested a timer resolution that is less than the platform's maximum timer resolution.
Requested Period 10000
Requesting process id 9464
Requesting process path \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Users\Mr.Glopez\Desktop\WinTimerTester.exe
Platform Timer Resolution: Timer Request Pending
A program or service requested a timer resolution that is less than the platform's maximum timer resolution.
Period requested 5000
Requesting process id 9044
Requesting process path \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files\ISLC\Intelligent standby list cleaner ISLC.exe
Platform Timer Resolution: Timer Request Pending
A program or service requested a timer resolution that is less than the platform's maximum timer resolution.
Requested period 20000
Requesting process id 5404
Requesting process path \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files (x86)\Razer\Synapse3\Service\Razer Synapse Service.exe
Power Directive:Long darkening timeout (with AC power)
The screen is set to automatically dim after more than 10 minutes.
Wait time (seconds) 885

Hi,
There is no mistake in how we name it. When we say the timer has a higher resolution, it means it is more precise, we must not look at pure numbers. That's is why it's the lower value. I know it sounds odd by that's how it is.

As for your second observation, the higher resolution request is always the winner. so If you set the timer rez to 0.50ms, if steam ask for 1.00ms it will be ignored because there is a timer higher resolution in place already.
I hope it is a little more clear now.

[ildar237]

Hello! I have win11 with 1028 latencymon values in 1 picture 58.50, with version 1029 in the second 54.30, does GlobalTimerResolutionRequests really make things worse?

[Wolvthebigbad]

I set my maximum timer resolution to 0,5ms but in the current timer resolution it shows as it is lower than that, is something wrong about this?

[Wagnard]

I set my maximum timer resolution to 0,5ms but in the current timer resolution it shows as it is lower than that, is something wrong about this?

I don't think it's a problem.

[ildar237]

I set my maximum timer resolution to 0,5ms but in the current timer resolution it shows as it is lower than that, is something wrong about this?

try on/off HPET on BIOS

[ildar237]

Hello! I have win11 with 1028 latencymon values in 1 picture 58.50, with version 1029 in the second 54.30, does GlobalTimerResolutionRequests really make things worse?

HEГP!!!

[Wagnard]

Hello! I have win11 with 1028 latencymon values in 1 picture 58.50, with version 1029 in the second 54.30, does GlobalTimerResolutionRequests really make things worse?

HEГP!!!

Not sure what to tell you. YOu should be happy to have a lower timer I guess. I have no idea with you have lower than 0.5

[streamoverlaypro]

Hello. I wonder if there is a way we can contribute with the software. Placing this code in Github will benefit many communities by placing fixes on parts that are taking several time to update.

I hope you consider opensourcing the codebase.
Thanks.

[Wagnard]

Hello. I wonder if there is a way we can contribute with the software. Placing this code in Github will benefit many communities by placing fixes on parts that are taking several time to update.

I hope you consider opensourcing the codebase.
Thanks.

I'll think about it. The code itself is not obfuscated so someone could just dotPeek at it.